Skip to main content

About your Search

20140426
20140504
STATION
CSPAN 18
CSPAN2 6
CNBC 2
CNNW 2
FBC 2
MSNBCW 2
KCSM (PBS) 1
KQED (PBS) 1
KTVU (FOX) 1
LINKTV 1
LANGUAGE
English 48
Search Results 0 to 47 of about 48 (some duplicates have been removed)
ousted president. >>> back here at home, clinton may not have yet made up her mind if she's running for president in 2016. but tim kane has. democratic national committee chairman announcing his support for mrs. clinton's potential 2016 presidential run. i announced his endorsement in south carolina. the senator saying, quote, she's the right person for the job. i'll be starting my fifth year in the senate on earring's day 2017. she's the partner i know i'll wants to be working with in the white house on all fronts. >> story about another former secretary of state, condoleeza rice, deciding not to deliver the commencement address at rutgers university in new jersey. in a statement, she says her involvement had become, quote, a distraction for the university communities. this comes after some students and faculty had held protests over her role in the iraq war. they say mrs. rice bore some responsibilities for the war as a member of the bush administration. the school originally planned to pay the former secretary $35,000 for her commencement speech. >>> arthel, in los angeles, the w
-- and, you know, not -- >> charlie: including carter, clinton and obama? >> everybody. bush, everybody. whether it's two-party talks, six-party talks. >> charlie: failed. and part of it is rational people trying to deal with crazies. >> charlie: and the chinese, too, is an element to it. they've got a lot to lose. >> the chinese have been less helpful than they could be. they have a strong interest in getting the issue dealt with. but here's the thing that's always struck me, the north koreans talk all the time about the fact that we're still technically at war with them, legally at war with them, because all we did was sign an arms agreement not a peace treaty. and during the periods where the negotiations were active, they kept saying why won't you declare you're not at war with us? and we say, you know, the usual thing, what you're taught as a diplomat or any kind of negotiator, it's a bargaining chip and we're holding the chip and of course we don't think we're at war with you. my view is bargaining chips you don't get to spend are not worth anything. so why not just say, okay. jus
by president clinton and continued to be violated by george bush. i don't blame russia for its great for our instincts to stop it. so that's a big part of the negotiating posture both countries are taking to the ice age for example could wind up green announcing the agreement that i believe was announced in tbilisi where we said that we were looking for georgia to eventually eventually be a member of the site of the american is going to die for tbilisi and article five applied to tbilisi with my tomato a phony alliance immediately. i make those having a hard time as it is anyway. it doesn't have the resolute desk trying anymore since the soviet threat went away and were desperately trying to find one for a doubt are out of area operations became the latest attempt to do so in afghanistan and elsewhere so visit this is a complex problem but it does have the answers to it. it just requires exquisite diplomacy had a lot of ability on both moscow and large the spark to sort of book of situation from as i said hey nobody wins except ukraine and others denied that cotton is trapped in the future o
seized by another country. would moscow show restraint week after week. how would president clinton responded parts of this country were seized to request to remove his army from those parts of the country. there is some irony in russian demand given the manner in which it would deal with separatism within its borders. it has been 63 days since russia began its campaign to annex crimea. the ukrainian government has chosen peace day after day. russia, day after day, has chosen to pursue more territory. consider the following facts. it stopped almost all train movements. that is an illegal act. it is an illegal act. for russian activists beat up to journalists near the administration building. we can go on and on about the illegal acts. 32 buildings are under occupation. we have seen dozens of officials legally detained. and the group of eight monitors objected in direct defiance. alongside all this action, we have heard the russian federation building its case for intervention. we were not even part in the ukraine in the good old days. invoking article 51 and self-defense as activate
today in moscow and also here in the u.s., we seem to be falling behind. during the first clinton administration, i recall that we had a bit of a debate. would it make sense to invite nato and russia to become over time a member of nato? recall, 12-13 years ago around 2001, that question was raised again. obviously the russian's response was we are not interested in being a member of nato, we are interested in the change a relationship. russia went further and came back to us more recently with a whole new concept for the relationship between the west and russia for european security. some of the ideas that were put forward by medvedev during his tenure as president of russia simply in our you were not acceptable to all in the west. it was just not going to work. i think to finish, we have thehed the point where ukrainian crisis, we will need to take a sharp look again at how we can over time construct a european order, a european security document that is good for us and also ok for russia. ahead, wase jump there a feeling that the west was taking advantage of russia at a time of
clinton and it was on the night of the attack at 10:07 p.m. when she released a statement to the media about the death of that foreign service officer. what we don't know is whether there really was intelligence that backed up that position. what we know is that within 24 hours, there was intelligence that conflicted but no correction was made. >> and we know that the president talked to secretary of state clinton before he came out. today in the rose garden the president was with the german president and he said something that raised some eyebrows on this issue. >> the notion that this is some spontaneous uprising in eastern ukraine is belied by all the evidence of well-organized, trained, armed me lish thats with capacity to shoot down helicopters. generally local protesters don't possess that capacity of surface-to-air missiles or whatever weapons were used to shoot down helicopters. >> the president is talking about russia's actions in eastern ukraine. but it sounded a lot like senator john mccain after benghazi. >> that's a stunning statement the president said i don't believe the
and tv guy. you have that. bill clinton, i guess, that was a radio thing, too. i like things interesting and different. >> so you want edgy? >> i want edgy. and i would argue that stephen colbert benefited from that and maybe benefitted in a partisan way that offended a lot of potential conservative fans of his. we knew where he was. >> i think it's tough because people are sitting there saying, 15 jokes about cnn and 30 about fox. zero about msnbc. >> the whole nerd prompt thing, it's such a ridiculous misnomer. are nerds this vain? >> i like it. our 50 minutes are up. >> our 50 minutes are up. have fun, everyone. >> you can, of course, read mark's book. watch joel mchale's big speech right here on cnn at the association dinner that starts at 8:00 p.m. eastern and we're going to have a red carpet preview event. don't worry. i won't be judging who wore it best. follow me on twitter @jaketapper. check out our show page @thelead. >> jake, thanks very much, breaking news, brink of war. the death toll and the unrest, is the crisis spiralling out of control? breaking news, banned from the nba
can debate whether it costs jobs or not. i remember when we raised the minimum wage under bill clinton we had the best following years of job creation we've had in the last 60 years. you can't debate the fact that when you raise the minimum wage it has the effect of raising other salaries up and up as well so i think there's a lot of stuff in the democratic arsenal and particularly the point larry makes is a good one what. do the republicans have to say about the economy? cutting taxes and lowering regulation? we tried that in the bush years, and it was a total failure. >> no, no. hang on a second. front page of the "new york times." bill clinton in his second term or actually after he got shell lacked in '94, and he's proud of this, and i'm going to back clint on on this. he was a great economic president. you know why? he was a supply-sider in his second term. he lowered the capital gains tax and participated in a deal with gingrich on welfare reform, on free trade. he did all the right things. those guys cut spending. that's the kind of agenda we need right now. here's one for you.
was being turned into a massive killing field the world stood idly by. both president clinton and ewan chief kofi annan had information that could have prevented or at least mitigated the rwanda genocide but chose indifference that enable the slaughter of unprecedented proportion. i herald a series of hearings, three, on rwanda and what are the people who we had information in hand. the general was there on the ground willing to take action to curtail what turned out to be upwards of 1 million people who were slaughtered and with that information, again i could've been prevented or at least largely mitigated. when the blood stopped flowing the word looked at the corpse piled high and shocked. never again was the phrase of egeland lives. it is happening again. our witnesses know and they will bear witness today. the question before us today is whether the phrase never again is one we sober used to pay lip service while nothing being done or not enough and whether not we're going to act. we do have to distinguish witnesses from state today and as i mentioned that's assistance secretary jackson
,rt with the oldced -- with the old ced plan, going back to clinton care, there is a lot of good stuff in the bill. let's build on that and a lot of bad stuff has been taken out, like the class act, more good news you never heard about. it has already been removed by the administration. sot people enjoy hating much. so, give credit where credit is due, and let's add a malpractice case to this bill. republicans are afraid to do that even though we could save tens of billions of dollars because they do not want the stigma of being associated with this bill. >> congressman? >> i could not disagree more. liability reform is something the republican house has been after for years. the missing link in the affordable care act was fixing tr, the liability system, and letting doctors talk to each other. >> where is the burgess bill on malpractice reform? >> i am glad you asked. >> that is not a bill, that is a book. >> you know this because you are a doctor, but here is the you heardl question, from the last panel repeal is not a viable alternative. millions of people have written contracts based on an exi
allies made a good faith effort to convince russia the security was converging. president clinton said the test of russia's measure is whether russia, the big neighbor, can be the good neighbor. despite the reservations of many new members, nato established the partnership for peace and negotiated the russia-nato piece agreement and some went so far to see that russia might join the alliance. but we were never blinded to the risk. former secretary of state warned in 1995 that among his words, one of the plans of preparing is that russia will abandoned behavior that characters history particularly during the soviet period. and nato must stand ready to visit the basic principles underlying its relationship with russia. nato enlargement didn't invite russian aggression. it didn't form crisis then or now. instead it settled old disputes and promoted freedom and free mact markets and advanced the cause of peace. that is why nato holds the door open for aspiring members. consider the alternative, a world without nato enlargement and not the asurances they provide. it would have risked a prec
're already hearing sort of the ways we might hear the economy talked about in 2016. bill clinton gave a speech this week where he talked about the prosperity of the 1990s and how he helped usher that in. that can be laying the ground work for a potential hillary clinton run in 2016. instead of them talking about what's going on in the economy now, you hear them harkin back to the good old days, the golden years of a way of enticing voters and getting them riled up as opposed to focusing on near-term policy issues. >> there's been a lot of talk from this administration and others around the globe, we have to do more to support smaller companies. they're the job creators and the drivers of growth. are the small businessmen, the smaller companies, now hiring or not? >> it appears that they are. when we looked at the reports from adt yesterday, what we did see is that the smaller companies are hiring the indicators again, the surveys of small businesses indicate they're hiring but doing so cautiously. they don't want to get too far ahead of where the economy is, but they are confident tha
, it was an attack. >> jones at the state department, and an e-mail that went to others, hillary clinton's chief of staff says she told the libyan ambassador september 12, 12:46 p.m., i told him the group that conducted the attack is affiliated with islamic extremists. would you agree or disagree with that statement? >> yes i would agree. the timing of it, i do not know. the content, yes. >> the scandal that is here, that some choose to ignore, a phony scandal, is the fact that the cia station chief, the military themselves. you have the person sitting front of us, who is the head of intelligence and he is looking at the intelligence. they come to the conclusion that it is austria -- sharia and then you have the state telling libyans. none of them think it is a video. none of them. the military, the cia, the cia station chief, the state department, all of them, the fact that the time, mr. chairman, the facts do not point to a video. that only comes from the white house. what was going on in the room, general? i were people were under attack and people were dying. what is the military doing? >> -
the secretary of state call up stuttgart and say "deploy some assets" or does she -- didn't secretary clinton speak with secretary panetta that night and general dempsey? >> there was a lot of coordination between the state department and the defense department about response to this. and, of course, there's a military chain of command about how assets get deployed and there are military decisions made about which assets make sense and can help to be deployed. believe me, again, what you -- the committee was getting at was a notion that we at the state department did not do everything we could, including coordinating with our military colleagues about a possible response. that notion is just not true. it has been repeatedly batted down by the senate select committee on intelligence, by other committees, bipartisan committees, who have held multiple hearings, including the house armed services committee. so while i appreciate this committee's attempt to continue talking about this issue, really this notion that they were pushing today has been repeatedly proven false. >> well, but it's not an
of assembleed. >> it was -- we felt it was an shareal sharia. >> to secretary of state hillary clinton's closest aide, including sheryl mills, the ambassador was sold share why wa sharia hasbeen responsible. mrs. clinton sent out a press release linking the video to the benghazi violence, mrs. clinton statement of the out of sink with -- sync with intelligence it was -- with the ben rhodes e-mail. testifying that state department did not respond quickly that night. >> it is not what they did in that situation, it is what they done do, they did not come forward with stronger requests for action. >> what was the mood -- the feeling? to save our people? >> it was desperation to be able to -- >> what. >> desperation to begin situational awareness and to do something. >> he was not in the operational al chain of command. >> meeting some who would like to distort your testimony, and suggestion tha that you are testifying we could have, should have done a lot more than we did because we had capabilities we did not use lies. >> this is -- utilize. >> this is not my testimony. >> thank you, general. >> w
is affiliated with islamic extremists. this coming from the state department, cheryl mills, secretary clinton posses chief of staff. i live -- i would like to enter this into the record. >> what was the date and time? >> september 12, 2012, hours after the attack. it is what the state department told the libyan government what was happening. "i told the libyan ambassador that the group attacks are affiliated with islamic extremists. those were the facts as the state department knew them. >> without objection, so ordered. copies will be distributed. we now welcome our guest and witnesses. general robert lovell is the former deputy director for intelligence and knowledge development director at the united states african command. and the former deputy command general of the joint task force. and a research fellow at the hoover institution. mr. david ross, phd, is a senior fellow at the foundation for defense of democracies. mr. frederick is a senior associate for middle east program at the carnegie endowment for international peace. your title is impressive but they're all doctorates. pursuant t
clinton. she once again is implicated in what did she know, when did she know it? it was on her watch, not john kerry's watch. >> they should find a big bail of straw and grasp at it. this is grasping of straws. >> this has been litigated, relitigated. there's been a review process. it was really tough on this administration. they accepted all that stuff. this is one random e-mail. it's not even about benghazi. it's about the protest. they grabbed this and would run with it. what the republicans have done, they have perfected the art of taking a random fact and whipping it up into a conspiracy. this is a conspiracy theory looking for a conspiracy. >> you know, you're trying out for jay carney's job. this is an absurdity. this is a long e-mail written in the white house during the period we're talking about. >> yes. >> by the way that's factually wrong about egypt as much as it is factually wrong about benghazi but to suggest that -- >> here's the thing. >> to suggest this say random thing, look at the length of the e-mail. >> if you look at what is going on here, nothing has changed a
. we'll play the sound and we'll get your reaction. >> does it matter president clinton, secretary clinton, excuse me? the difference between a coordinated terrorist attack you should have planned for, closing the consulate rather than keeping it open does matter. difference between a spontaneous event, rise of terrorism a broader foreign policy failure is substantial. you can not let these people get away with it anymore than you let richard nixon get away with what he did. jenna: is it fair. >> yes it is. if intelligence community saying this isn't a terrorist attack, they didn't mention some video that caused this, but administration decided no, we don't want it to be a terrorist attack. that flies in the face of our claim al qaeda is on the ropes. let's blame it on a video. if that is what happened and the president of the united states threw his people in the white house skew that intelligence reporting and said no, no, it wasn't our fault. it was because of a demonstration that nobody could have -- what it is president saying i'm going to use or the president's people, i'm go
washington, d.c. is strobe talbot, president of the brookings institution served in the clinton administration from 1993 to 2001. for the new independent states of the former soviet union. pro-russian forces, are taking over, president putin denies involvement just as he did in crimea. for all practical purposes you are saying he has already invaded ukraine? >> he certainly has. these are not just pro-russian forces, these are pro-russian forces that are highly inif i recall traited by russian forces. what we are hearing from president putin is another stunning case of the big lie that we can remember from decades ago, which is now front and center. everybody should know it's a lie. and are that is part of the -- and that is part of the outrage we're seeing. >> i think big lie you are referring to the old sophi soviet propaganda? >> that's right, antonio, paws of the inaccurate information that's coming out including by the way photographs of identifiable russian officers who are in ukraine running these operations. the very fact that the russians put on masks, is almost to thro
: let's be joined by doug schoen. former advisor to bill clinton and monica crowley. stun can the testimony we just heard. you could tell the brigadier general was emotional. it struck me when he said it's not that we could or couldn't have gotten there in time, he says we should have tried. he says the military is always trained to go in the direction of the gunfire and he felt that night we did not. he said the attracts were attributable almost -- the attacks were attributable almost right away, and we heard of this state department memo to the libyan officials, this isal this al-sharia. >> this is not a partisan matter. you know and monica knows i'm a democrat. i have supported the clintons. i probably will probably hope to support hillary clinton. but she and her team have many questions to answer. the president has much to answer because the so-called talking points, the emails that have come out suggest a very different story. the obvious question is where did these talking points come from, how could they have been crafted in light of what you reported and what the gene
-- what i'm seing from where i'm sitting, what i read, is the lone superpower that bill clinton talked about that america could no longer afford to be, becoming weaker, everybody else is becoming emboldened. i see people flexing their muscles buzz of our weakness and lack of resolve that we have. where do you think this will lead? where do you think russia will end up? will they go into other areas? where there's a large russian-speaking population. do either of you see that? >> we see that there's a risk and the russians have influence in those areas but it is our policy to exact a coast -- a cost from the russians for their behavior that's in violation of international norms. >> and do you feel the sanction this is a we are talking about, that we've done, do you think they'll have any impact on russian's agrecian? >> sir, the purpose of sanctions is to try to influence russian behavior, it's meant to bring it back within international norms. >> how is that working so far? ms. friedt? >> i couldn't -- >> if i may, sir. this could be a long process, sir. >> but again, do we have compli
roth. we were so passionate about it, madeleine may remember, that president clinton joked that ato must be offering to move the headquarters to wilmington, delaware -- because -- no, i'm serious. it was -- do you remember that's what he said at the time of the official vote. but you know, all these years later, there are some who look at russia's aggression in ukraine and say -- maybe we should not have extended security guarantees to poland, romania, bulgaria and the baltic states. but i think it shows we had to extend that guarantee, because we reject and continue to reject, have rejected the notion of a sphere of influence built on the backs of the people who deserve freedom -- freedom that we always supported and that we believe is as vital today as it was then. and let's be clear -- the current crisis born in the enlargment of nato and the eu 15 yeras ago has nothing to do with -- 15 years ago has nothing to do with the enlargement of nato. it was born in the kremlin. it was born in putin's mind. t has nothing to do with the fact that we expanded nato. and here's another debat
roth. we were so passionate about it, madeleine may remember, that president clinton joked that nato must be offering to move the headquarters to wilmington, delaware -- because -- no, i'm serious. it was -- do you remember that's what he said at the time of the official vote. but you know, all these years later, there are some who look at russia's aggression in ukraine and say -- maybe we should not have extended security guarantees to poland, romania, bulgaria and the baltic states. but i think it shows we had to extend that guarantee, because we reject and continue to reject, have rejected the notion of a sphere of influence built on the backs of the people who deserve freedom -- freedom that we always supported and that we believe is as vital today as it was then. and let's be clear -- the current crisis born in the enlargment of nato and the eu 15 yeras ago has nothing to do with -- 15 years ago has nothing to do with the enlargement of nato. it was born in the kremlin. it was born in putin's mind. it has nothing to do with the fact that we expanded nato. and here's another deba
about the job-killing nature of this dramatic 40% proposed increase in minimum wage. president clinton's economic advisor gene sperling, who just left this administration, the obama administration, back in 1998 wrote a memo to president cline continue when a similar -- president clinton when a similar proposal was being made. now the harkin bill that we're going to vet on shortly proposes to raise the minimum wage 40%. this was back in 1978 gene sperling writing to president clington on a proposed increase of the minimum wage by 41%. the same sort of proposal. so this is what mr. sperling wrote: "your entire economic team believes that this approach is too aggressive and are concerned that senator kennedy's proposal" -- it was senator teddy kennedy's proposal back in 1978 -- "could approve damaging to the employment prospects of low-skilled workers." again, that's whatd c.b.o., the congressional budget office said about this bill. he goes on to say "as well as to the general macroeconomic performance of the economy." so what are our friends across the aisle proposing we do when the eco
read -- this morning by reading an excerpt from a memo by gene sperling to president clinton t relates it a minimum wage proposal similar to the one we're considering today. here's what he wrote: "your entire economic team believes that this approach is too aggressive and are concerned that it could approve damaging to employment prospects of low-skilled workers, as well as to the general microeconomic performance of our economy." bue memo noted there was a plus side to supporting the proposal. it would unify the liberal wing of the democratic party. well, today feels like deja vu all over again because even though our constituents keep telling us that they expect washington to focus on jobs, that's clearly not what they're getting from the senate. instead senate democrats are pushing legislation today that would cost as many as a million jobs in this country, legislation that the left flank of their party demands. that's their response to the pleas of our constituents to do something about jobs. the proposal that nonpartisan analysts tells us could cost jobs. these are the same washin
to restore the solvensy of social security in 1983 up to the balanced budgets of the clinton administration. president obama has put the right american in charge. we welcome you before our committee today. i wanted to focus in two areas in this round. first of all, in the housing sector where our secondary market is in a bit of a jam at this point. we know that wall street's terrible mortgage securitization record created the largest transfer of capital from main street to wall street in our history. african-americans lost all their accumulated equity since world war ii. hispanic americans similarly, working class people across this country. i represent communities terribly impacted by the securitization meltdown. my question is, what is treasury doing to perhaps working with the justice department to recoup some of those assets for these hard-working americans in communities that have been so devastated? and have you considered, in addition to bringing back -- by the way, those banks are doing very well, the major ones that were a part of this. everybody seems to be fine up there. but have
, is the lone superpower that bill clinton talked about that america could no longer afford to be, becoming weaker, everybody else is becoming emboldened. i see people flexing their muscles buzz of our weakness and lack of resolve that we have. where do you think this will lead? where do you think russia will end up? will they go into other areas? where there's a large russian-speaking population. do either of you see that? >> we see that there's a risk and the russians have influence in those areas but it is our policy to exact a coast -- a cost from the russians for their behavior that's in violation of international norms. >> and do you feel the sanction this is a we are talking about, that we've done, do you think they'll have any impact on russian's agrecian? purpose of sanctions is to try to influence russian behavior, it's meant to bring it back within international norms. >> how is that working so far? s. friedt? >> i couldn't -- >> if i may, sir. this could be a long process, sir. >> but again, do we have compliance with other nations? are they putting strong sanctions in place too
clinton said a decision would come before the end of 2011. in march, 2013, president clinton told all of the senate republicans in our caucus where he was invited to come and visit with us about anything he wanted to talk about, one of the questions that came up, that a decision would be made on this pipeline would be made before the end of 2013. that was 13 months ago. and yet, no decision. so as has been stated by my colleagues on good friday afternoon of this year, the state department announced an indefinite delay in the comment period on the pipeline project. so it appears unlikely that president obama will make a decision any time in the near future, if ever. this indefinite delay is mind-boggling, considering all the advantages of this pipeline. granting the permit for the pipeline will create thousands of jobs directly and indirectly. it will provide more than 800,000 barrels of canadian oil daily from a friendly economic partner. rejection of the pipeline permit will not affect canada's decision to develop these oil resources, because, you know, they are smarter than we are.
with president clinton -- putin? if we are going to be effective, we need to take as much as we can out of the public arena and deal privately with these issues. when it has become a contest between our presidents, who can do what to the other, it becomes, i think, very emotional , and tends to push things in the wrong direction. so i would hope, having done some of the sanctions that we promised, when we promised them, we have to do them. try, to the maximum, to go private. in particular, i think where we can be most helpful is convincing the authorities in kiev to come to any reasonable terms that the russians are asking. publicly at least they are asking for a federal constitution. they are asking for equal treatment of the russian and ukrainian languages and asking for a pledge of neutrality. i think all of those three demands on the surface are reasonable. quietly to me working with the ukrainians in kiev and the europeans is going to be more helpful than the sanctions. ambassador, what could the obama administration do differently than previous administrations had done in the past
the affordable care act, 8 million people signing up, and at the same time in another state, chelsea clinton is doing an event and tells people that she is pregnant. and then people are buzzing, what does this mean for 2016? probably nothing, but it means that people are already looking ahead. that is a problem exercising power abroad. it is a challenge that he needs to look at ahead. guest: it is a challenge being named a lame duck, so early in the second term, but the truth is he has not been able to get much done in congress. if power shifts to republicans in the senate, he does not have that one chamber to wooster his priorities, so it will be very interesting, as we said before, to see how the white house works y completelyiall control republican congress. i read earlier that he may start to worry too much and give away the store, the issues that they care about. hard to predict at this point, but definitely tricky for the white house, in that they still have two and a half years of governing and they are not able to get much of his agenda done. guest: and the republicans know this. if
dark secret, hillary clinton 2016. what does wall street think about a potential hillary clinton presidency? >> you know, this was a real surprise that maggie haberman and ben white turned up as they talked to a couple dozen people that work around or in wall street. in the financial services world they said their first choice would be jeb bush. their second choice would be chris christie. but what if neither of them is available in 2016, these republicans say they would be perfectly happy to have hillary clinton. they say that they see her as approachable. they have a track record with her. she was the new york senator for eight years. so the number of wall street people were advisers to her. she worked making money for the clinton foundation. and she's been out on the circuit among the many places -- >> i smell a rat. i smell a rat. >> okay. >> these republicans, they want to say that because it will then ultimately hurt hillary. won't it? right? >> listen, you hear this not just on wall street. you talk to republicans around the country who are disappointed in governor christi
come back, hillary clinton and jeb bush continue to fan speculation we may be headed for another bush-clinton matchup. our panel comes back to read the tea leaves. >>> plus, what would you like to ask the panel about the presidential race? just go to facebook or twitter and fox news sunday. we may use your question on the air. true business-grade internet comes with secure wifi for your business. it also comes with public wifi for your customers. not so with internet from the phone company. i would email the phone company to inquire as to why they have shortchanged these customers. but that would require wifi. switch to comcast business internet and get two wifi networks included. comcast business built for business. >> the security in ben gauze yu and the loss of two state department personnel and two cia contractors from the terrorist attack and the terrible consequences of that. it's very, very painful, and it was certainly the biggest regret that i had as secretary of state. >> hillary clinton this week making a rare reference to the benghazi terrorist attack, and we're back now with the
with the last days of the soviet union and goes to the current time. you were in the clinton administration. you were in the obama -- the bush administration, the state department's on policy planning. tell us, if you look back, clinton administration, bush administration, obama administration, who handled russia better? if you want, of course, you may start with bush won. favorably disposed. >> guest: right. in my book i discuss for resets that we have had since the close of the soviet union. i was in policy planning in the last 18 months of the clinton administration, six months of the bush administration and then the national intelligence. both times when i served in government we were already on the kind of downward slide in the u.s.-russian relationship. i think the first reset was brief because obviously president george h. w. bush did a lot with president yeltsin, but that was very much when the focus and, of course, general scowcroft was the national security adviser -- with best focus was on disarmament, arms control issues, denude keel are rising ukraine and making sure after the colla
. if the fox news sunday exclusive. then jeb bush opens the door to a 2016 presidential run. it's another bush-clinton mashup in store? our sunday panel handicaps the potential showdown. and -- we'll have a report from rome where hundreds of thousands gather to watch history as two popes become saints. all right now on "fox news sunday." >>> the supreme court sided with michigan which along with seven other states has banned public universities from using race as a factor in college admissions. joining us now, jennifer grass, whose rejection from the university of michigan inspired her to lead the drive to ban racial preferences, and shanta driver, a civil rights attorney who argued before the supreme court in defense of affirmative action. welcome to both of you tows sun. >> thank you. >> i want to begin by revisiting previous rulings by the supreme court on affirmative action, rulings that still stand. in 2003 the court said this. student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify the use of race in university admissions. what's wrong with the limited use of race to achieve that
this to say when asked if hillary clinton was her candidate in 2016. >> all of the women -- democratic women of the senate urged hillary clinton to run. i hope she does. >> she's your candidate. >> hillary is terrific. >> hmm. dozens of tornadoes could pummel the mid section over the next 48 hours. we'll get the latest on when and where the severe storms are supposed to hit. also, pope francis making his history today in a first of its kind ceremony for the roman catholic church. we'll take you live to rome next. later, as this flyer says, you can sleep tonight knowing the kkk could be coming to your neighborhood soon. the details on that coming up. >>> developing right now we continue to keep a close eye on the potential for severe weather this afternoon. in just the past few minutes a likely tornado has touched down in nebraska. wnbc meteorologists have been tracking the storms. what a difference 15 minutes makes, huh? >> that's right. this is a rapidly evolving situation. right now reports of a spotted tornado in nebraska. you can see south of i-80 here. a tornado watch was issued. now a
, and i think when i look at disrespect that was put up to george w. bush and to bill clinton and hillary clinton back in the 1990's, who were accused of every contained of thing, including kidnap, murder drug smuggling, all these kind of things, and the whole birther narrative doesn't sound like that much that's new in politics. but i think getting back to the affordable care act, all along even during the heated a.c.a. debate the public dent like obamacare, which is a republican term, but they liked the features that obamacare the a.c.a. offered, and that's still true. you're seeing a republican now talk about mend it, don't end it or let's repair, it not repeal, that there are things like -- well covering preexisting conditions and other features that the affordable care act offers that we didn't have before. there's a lot of positives that the a.c.a. can be sold, but that's what i was referring to earlier when i said that the democratic strategy is to not so much push obama as to push the care just that's where the real vote-getter
. more than a dozen people were injured. >> and hilary clinton says her faith was shaped by her devout grandmother. speaking at a conference of methodist women in kentucky. she says her faith helped guide her initiatives at the state department including efforts to fight human trafficking. >> a letter written by a passenger on the titanic selling at auction for $200,000. in the letter the passenger is saying in part, quote, the sailors say we have had a wonderful passage up to now. >> and the faithful are already gathering in vatican city. let's take a look at live pictures from the vatican. as you can see, thousands of people are ready to witness papal history. the ceremony doesn't start for a few hours. let's just listen for a second. listen to that crowd. well, it will be tomorrow morning, the day of the four popes because two living popes will preside over the canonization of two others. joining us to talk about the lives of these men is the director of the pope john paul ii shrine in washington defendant c. good to see you. first of all, why these two men? very different and why n
president clinton, come four square against, well, first obamacare, second the president is foot dragging on the xl keystone pipeline. the head of the union, a layoff long democrat he says this quote, for the record, our union was among those that twice supported the obama/biden ticket that does not negate our right and obligations to speak out when because of politics the administration fails to stand up for working people and the men and women we represent. >> job security, it's going to potentially get us independent, if it finally goes through. it's already been six years, folks. and was made by the president to delay this potentially after mid terms was dropped on good friday if you'll remember. the other thing about this is what message this is sending to canada, our northern ally. what message this is sending to vladimir putin. is this a message of weakness. >> obama administration grow a southwest antlers and take a message from popeye and eat some spinach, unquote. antlers and spinach, prescription for america. >> help your buddies in hollywood mad about the pipeline because of t
Search Results 0 to 47 of about 48 (some duplicates have been removed)